Divide Us Now
Comments: 12 - Date: November 27th, 2007 - Categories: Songs
Divide Us Now
© Williams 2007
Are you lonely? Are you happy?
Do you miss the times we had?
We used to play, we used to fight,
We used to face things side by side;
You with paint and me with words –
Our guns to leave the dark disturbed
(Are you lonely? Are you happy?
Will you ever want this back?)
Are you there? You said you’d be
A place to turn to in my need,
And I need you now, I need that space,
I need you, but you turn away.
Don’t you see me? Don’t you hear me?
I know you don’t believe me;
Don’t believe in me.
(The master’s tools, the master’s house.
You’ve decided to divide us now)
Download: Divide Us Now (mp3)
Background
A couple of weeks ago we had the Transgender Day of Remembrance, with capital letters and all.
For whatever reason, I’ve been spending a lot of time on blogs recently, instead of on the boards I sometimes frequent. And I’ve been reading, specifically, lots of transwomen’s blogs. Usually I fall in with transguys on the internet, but recently I’ve been reading Sexual Ambiguities, Questioning Transphobia, and a couple of others. And I’ve been really shocked to realise that the terrible stuff you hear about (some, not all) radical feminists is actually true. There are some really horribly transphobic radfems out there, and they’re still being loudly transphobic to this day.
At one point during a recent (i.e. from this year) discussion, someone describing herself as a radical feminist broke out the Audre Lorde quote, “The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house”, arguing that transpeople who claim to be working against the oppression of women are, basically, liars, because we are ‘buying in’ to the gender system by transitioning. Of course, this neatly ignores the fact that not all transpeople jump straight out of one gender box and into another, and that many radical feminists, by defending a very narrow version of ‘women’, are reproducing and enforcing gender binaries, marginalising (and, yes, oppressing) other vulnerable minorities. It’s also a pretty ironic choice of quotation to start throwing around. Anyway, someone else in the comments thread picked this up and proceeded to argue that one of the master’s tools was division – setting people up against each other, and teaching them to refuse to listen to other points of view (Don’t you hear me? Don’t you see me?), to shut themselves off to other truths in situations (I know you don’t believe me; don’t believe in me).
This song was also influenced by an amusing situation I found myself in at a recent symposium at the University of Melbourne, sitting next to Sheila Jeffreys, who is quite notorious for her transphobia (or trans hate, or whatever). It was kind of bizarre. And over lunch I noticed that she didn’t really mingle with the other academics from Melbourne – whether or not that was by choice, or because they avoided each other, I don’t know. So, as I am wont to do, I read too much into it, started feeling sorry for her, started imagining that she was lonely, etc, etc, etc. Damn writer’s mind! Always making up stories! Anyway, hence the opening line of the song, and “Will you ever want this back?”
This song is partly my late contribution to the TDoR, but I would like to dedicate it especially to Queen Emily and Lisa.
Recording
Wow! This song I built almost entirely on GarageBand – I had a few lines and a tune in my head, then constructed the finished product around the software beats, a piano part that I played then sampled and repeated, an inbuilt bass guitar riff that I pitch shifted around, some fake strings and suchlike, and MANY, MANY HARMONIES! I know! I bet you weren’t expecting them at all!
Those of you with weirdly good aural memories might have picked up that a couple of the beats are almost exactly the same as ones I used in The Weatherman. This wasn’t intentional at all. I just picked out the ones that were an appropriate tempo, and that I liked the sound of. I guess this means that I have a tendency to write songs that are a similar speed, and that I am consistent in the percussion sounds I like. Maybe in the future I’ll pick a beat that I wouldn’t usually go for and write a song around that, as a little challenge.
Recording was . . . interesting. I used a LOT of software stuff, which is a bit challenging for me. I also used quite a few effects on the vocals (but all quite minor, except the REVERB!), in order to try to get a better EQ balance. I think it’s worked OK, though I really need to get a microphone if I want a better vocal quality.
Things I Like
I like the little vinyl crackles at the start and the end of the track. Hee! Because it’s a record, you see?! I’m quite fond of the sentiment of the song, too.
Things I Like Less
I think if I was going to write this song again, I would try to incorporate a bridge, as I think it’s a little repetitive. I’m not too sure about the fake strings, either. Maybe I should find some better software string sounds. I do wonder, also, if the sentiment comes through correctly with the words. I wrote a number of lines that didn’t make the final cut because they were a bit ham-fisted, and I fear that some of the ones I kept in aren’t much better. I hope it’s oblique and ambiguous enough (though I guess I’m the only one who can make such a subjective judgement for myself).
Conclusion
Yay! A new-new song! And I quite like it! I know I pretty much always say that, but there’s usually something I get from writing, recording or re-listening to them. I’ve spent so much time tweaking and mixing this one, though, that I can’t really objectively assess it at the moment – all I can hear are the faults. I’ll leave the objectiveness to your good selves – please let me know what you think!
Also – YES! The Liberals LOST THE ELECTION!!!
By all means, please share this song with people you think might be interested, but please link to this post rather than directly to the download. Thank you!